Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Journals
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Banshal, Sumit Kumar
- Research Performance of Indian Institutes of Technology
Abstract Views :245 |
PDF Views:80
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Computer Science, South Asian University, New Delhi 110 021, IN
2 Department of Computer Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221 005, IN
3 CSIR-NISTADS, New Delhi 110 012, IN
1 Department of Computer Science, South Asian University, New Delhi 110 021, IN
2 Department of Computer Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221 005, IN
3 CSIR-NISTADS, New Delhi 110 012, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 112, No 05 (2017), Pagination: 923-932Abstract
This article presents a computational analysis of the research performance of 16 relatively older Indian Institutes of Technology (IITs) in India. The research publication data indexed in Web of Science for all the 16 IITs is used for the analysis. The data is computationally analysed to identify productivity, productivity per capita, rate of growth of research output, authorship and collaboration pattern, citation impact and discipline-wise research strengths of the different IITs. The research performances of the IITs have been compared with those of two top ranking engineering and technology institutions of the world (MIT-USA and NTU-Singapore) and most cited papers from these IITs have also been identified. The analytical results are expected to provide a informative, up-to-date and useful account of research performance assessment of the IITs.Keywords
Engineering Research, IIT, Research Competitiveness, Research Performance, Scientometrics.- Research Performance of Central Universities in India
Abstract Views :272 |
PDF Views:81
Authors
Affiliations
1 DST-Centre for Interdisciplinary Mathematical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221 005, IN
2 Department of Computer Science, South Asian University, New Delhi 110 021, IN
3 Department of Computer Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221 005, IN
1 DST-Centre for Interdisciplinary Mathematical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221 005, IN
2 Department of Computer Science, South Asian University, New Delhi 110 021, IN
3 Department of Computer Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221 005, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 112, No 11 (2017), Pagination: 2198-2207Abstract
This article presents the research performance of the 39 central universities in India. The research publication data, indexed in the Web of Science, for the 39 central universities for a 25-year period (1990-2014) are used for analysis. The data are computationally analysed to identify productivity, productivity per capita, productivity per crore rupees grant, rate of growth of research output, authorship and collaboration pattern, citation impact and discipline-wise research strength of these institutions. Research performance of the central universities is measured and compared with two top-ranking world universities, namely University of Cambridge and Stanford University. While older well-established big universities such as University of Delhi and Banaras Hindu University perform better than newer universities, some relatively smaller universities, such as the university of Hyderabad have impressive research performance. What is disturbing is that combined research output of all central universities taken together is less than that of either of University of Cambridge or Stanford University alone. The results also provide discipline-wise research strengths of all the universities.Keywords
Central Universities, Publication Data, Research Performance, Scientometrics.References
- Government of India, 12th Five Year Plan 2012–17, Planning Commission, p. 47; http://12thplan.gov.in/
- UGC, Higher Education in India at a glance, June 2013; http://www.ugc.ac.in/pdfnews/6805988_HEglance2013.pdf
- Prathap, G. and Gupta, B. M., Ranking of Indian engineering and Technological institutes for their research performance during 1999–2008. Curr. Sci., 2009, 97(3), 304–306.
- Prathap, G. and Gupta, B. M., Ranking of Indian universities for their research output and quality using a new performance index. Curr. Sci., 2009, 97(6), 751–752.
- Raghuraman, K. P., Chander, R. and Madras, G., Scientometric analysis of some disciplines: comparison of Indian institutions with other international institutions. Curr. Sci., 2010, 99(5), 577–587.
- Prathap, G., Benchmarking research performance of the IITs using Web of Science and Scopus bibliometric databases. Curr. Sci., 2013, 105(8), 1134–1138.
- Nishy, P., Panwar, Y., Prasad, S., Mandal, G. K. and Prathap, G., An impact–citations–exergy (iCX) trajectory analysis of leading research institutions in India. Scientometrics, 2012, 91(1), 245–251.
- Kaur, H. and Mahajan, P., Ranking of medical institutes of India for quality and quantity: a case study. Scientometrics, 2015, 91(1), 245–251.
- Basu, A., Banshal, S. K., Singhal, K. and Singh, V. K., Designing a composite index for research performance evaluation at the national or regional level: ranking Central Universities in India. Scientometrics, 2016, 107(3), 1171–1193.
- University Grants Commission faculty size data report, 2014; http://www.ugc.ac.in/pdfnews/0342004_vacant-position-CU-as-on-01-01-2014.pdf
- UGC Annual Report, 2013; http://www.ugc.ac.in/pdfnews/7938259_Annual-Report-2013-14.pdf
- Glanzel, W., National characteristics in international scientific Co-authorship relations. Scientometrics, 2001, 51(1), 69–115.
- Rupika, Uddin, A. and Singh, V. K., Measuring the university–industry–government collaboration in Indian research output. Curr. Sci., 2016, 110(10), 1904–1909.
- UNESCO Global Education Digest, 2012; http://www.uis.unesco.org/Education/Pages/ged-2012-press-release.aspx
- Adams, J., Pendlebury, D. and Stembridge, B., Building BRICKS: exploring the global research and innovation impact of Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Korea, Thompson Reuters Report, 2013.
- Research Performance of the National Institutes of Technology in India
Abstract Views :236 |
PDF Views:71
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Computer Science, South Asian University, New Delhi 110 021, IN
2 Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Galgotias College of Engineering and Technology, Greater Noida 201 306, IN
3 Department of Computer Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221 005, IN
1 Department of Computer Science, South Asian University, New Delhi 110 021, IN
2 Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Galgotias College of Engineering and Technology, Greater Noida 201 306, IN
3 Department of Computer Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221 005, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 115, No 11 (2018), Pagination: 2025-2036Abstract
This article presents a bibliometric assessment of research performance of the National Institutes of Technology (NITs) in India. While many of these institutes were originally established in 1960s as Regional Engineering Colleges (RECs), they were upgraded to NITs around 2002 and later. Initially NITs offered only undergraduate programmes in engineering. However, during the last decade, several NITs have started postgraduate teaching and are focusing more on research activities. It is in this context that this article assesses the research performance of NITs during 2005–2016. The performance assessment uses research publication data obtained from the Web of Science index. The data collected are computationally analysed to identify productivity, productivity per capita, rate of growth of research, international collaboration pattern, citation impact and discipline-wise distribution of the research output for the NITs. The performance of NITs is also viewed vis-à-vis two top-performing Indian institutions, namely Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru and Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai. A simple single-value composite ranking of research performance of NITs is also presented by combining quantity and quality factors. The study presents an informative and useful account of assessment of research work in the NITs.Keywords
Bibliometric Assessment, Research Performance, Scientometrics, Technological Institutes.References
- http://www.mnnit.ac.in/images/stories/KAKODKAR_COMMITTEE_ REPORT-for-NITs.pdf
- Banshal, S. K., Singh, V. K., Basu, A. and Muhuri, P. K.. Research performance of Indian Institutes of Technology. Curr. Sci., 2017, 112(5), 923–932.
- Solanki, T., Uddin, A. and Singh, V. K.. Research competitiveness of Indian institutes of science education and research. Curr. Sci., 2016, 110(3), 307.
- Marisha, Banshal, S. K. and Singh, V. K., Research performance of central universities in India. Curr. Sci., 2017, 112(11), 2198–2208.
- Uddin, A. and Singh, V. K., A quantity–quality composite ranking of Indian institutions in CS research. IETE Tech. Rev., 2015, 32(4), 273–283.
- Prathap, G. and Gupta, B. M., Ranking of Indian engineering and technological institutes for their research performance during 1999–2008. Curr. Sci., 2009, 97(3), 304–306.
- Prathap, G.. Benchmarking research performance of the IITs using Web of Science and Scopus bibliometric databases. Curr. Sci., 2013, 105(8), 1134–1138.
- Prathap, G., The performance of research-intensive higher educational institutions in India. Curr. Sci., 2014, 107(3), 389–396.
- http://www.scimagoir.com/
- Nishy, P., Panwar, Y., Prasad, S., Mandal, G. K. and Prathap, G., An impact-citationsexergy (iCX) trajectory analysis of leading research institutions in India. Scientometrics, 2012, 91(1), 245–251.
- Bala, A. and Kumari, S., Research performance of national institutes of technology (NITs) of India during 2001–2010: a bibliometric analysis. SRELS J. Inf. Manage., 2013, 50(5), 555–572.
- https://www.scopus.com/home.uri
- https://apps.webofknowledge.com/
- Rupika, Uddin, A. and Singh, V. K., Measuring the university– industry–government collaboration in Indian research output. Curr. Sci., 2016, 110(10), 1904–1909.
- Basu, A., Banshal, S. K., Singhal, K. and Singh, V. K., Designing a composite index for research performance evaluation at the national or regional level: ranking Central Universities in India. Scientometrics, 2016, 107(3), 1171–1193.
- https://www.nirfindia.org/engg
- http://www.urapcenter.org/2015/world.php?q=MTI1MS0xNTAw
- http://www.webometrics.info/en
- https://www.timeshighereducation.com/
- http://www.shanghairanking.com/
- https://www.topuniversities.com/university-rankings
- How Much Research Output from India Gets Social Media Attention?
Abstract Views :230 |
PDF Views:84
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Computer Science, South Asian University, New Delhi 110 021,, IN
2 Department of Computer Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221 005, IN
3 GESIS Leibniz Institute for Social Sciences, Cologne, DE
1 Department of Computer Science, South Asian University, New Delhi 110 021,, IN
2 Department of Computer Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221 005, IN
3 GESIS Leibniz Institute for Social Sciences, Cologne, DE
Source
Current Science, Vol 117, No 5 (2019), Pagination: 753-760Abstract
Scholarly articles are now increasingly being mentioned and discussed in social media platforms, sometimes even as pre- or post-print version uploads. Measures of social media mentions and coverage are now emerging as an alternative indicator of impact of scholarly articles. This article aims to explore how much scholarly research output from India is covered in different social media platforms, and how similar or different it is from the world average. It also analyses the disciplinewise variations in coverage and altmetric attention for Indian research output, including a comparison with the world average. Results obtained show interesting patterns. Only 28.5% of the total research output from India is covered in social media platforms, which is about 18% less than the world average. ResearchGate and Mendeley are the most popular social media platforms in India for scholarly article coverage. In terms of discipline-wise variation, medical sciences and biological sciences have relatively higher coverage across different platforms compared to disciplines like information science and engineering.Keywords
Disciplinary Variation, Research Output, Scholarly Articles, Social Media.References
- http://www.researchgate.net (accessed on 14 May 2019).
- http://www.twitter.com (accessed on 14 May 2019).
- http://www.facebook.com (accessed on 14 May 2019).
- http://www.academia.edu (accessed on 14 May 2019).
- http://www.mendeley.com (accessed on 14 May 2019).
- Priem, J., Altmetrics. Beyond Bibliometrics: Harnessing Multidimensional Indicators of Scholarly Impact, MIT Press, 2014, pp. 263–288.
- Priem, J. and Hemminger, B. H., Scientometrics 2.0: New metrics of scholarly impact on the social web. First Monday, 2010, 15(7); http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2874/257 (accessed on June 2018).
- Haustein, S., Peters, I., Sugimoto, C. R., Thelwall, M. and Larivière, V., Tweeting biomedicine: an analysis of tweets and citations in the biomedical literature. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2014, 65(4), 656–669.
- Thelwall, M. and Kousha, K., ResearchGate: disseminating, communicating, and measuring scholarship? J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2015, 66(5), 876–889.
- Sugimoto, C. R., Work, S., Larivière, V. and Haustein, S., Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: a review of the literature. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2017, 68(9), 2037–2062.
- Banshal, S. K., Basu, A., Singh, V. K. and Muhuri, P. K., Scientific vs public attention: a comparison of top cited papers in WoS and top papers by altmetric score. In Proceedings of AROSIM 2018 – Communications in Computer and Information Science, Springer, Singapore, 2018, vol. 856, pp. 81–95.
- Shema, H., Bar‐Ilan, J. and Thelwall, M., Do blog citations correlate with a higher number of future citations? Research blogs as a potential source for alternative metrics. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2014, 65(5), 1018–1027.
- Thelwall, M., Interpreting correlations between citation counts and other indicators. Scientometrics, 2016, 108(1), 337–347.
- Peters, I., Kraker, P., Lex, E., Gumpenberger, C. and Gorraiz, J., Research data explored: an extended analysis of citations. Scientometrics, 2016, 107(2), 723–744.
- Costas, R., Zahedi, Z. and Wouters, P., Do ‘altmetrics’ correlate with citations? Extensive comparison of altmetric indicators with citations from a multidisciplinary perspective. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2015, 66(10), 2003–2019.
- Thelwall, M., Early Mendeley readers correlate with later citation counts. Scientometrics, 2018, 115(3), 1231–1240.
- Thelwall, M. and Kousha, K., ResearchGate versus Google Scholar: which finds more early citations? Scientometrics, 2017, 112(2), 1125–1131.
- Thelwall, M. and Nevill, T., Could scientists use Altmetric.com scores to predict longer term citation counts? J. Informetr., 2018, 12(1), 237–248.
- Sotudeh, H., Mazarei, Z. and Mirzabeigi, M., CiteULike bookmarks are correlated to citations at journal and author levels in library and information science. Scientometrics, 2015, 105(3), 2237–2248.
- Chen, K., Tang, M., Wang, C. and Hsiang, J., Exploring alternative metrics of scholarly performance in the social sciences and humanities in Taiwan. Scientometrics, 2015, 102(1), 97–112.
- Cho, J., A comparative study of the impact of Korean research articles in four academic fields using altmetrics. Perform. Meas. Metrics, 2017, 18(1), 38–51.
- Holmberg, K. and Woo, H., An altmetric investigation of the online visibility of South Korea-based scientific journals. Scientometrics, 2018, 117(1), 603–613.
- Bangani, S., The impact of electronic theses and dissertations: a study of the institutional repository of a university in South Africa. Scientometrics, 2018, 115(1), 131–151.
- Shu, F., Lou, W. and Haustein, S., Can twitter increase the visibility of Chinese publications? Scientometrics, 2018, 116(1), 505–519.
- Liu, Y., Lin, D., Xu, X., Shan, S. and Sheng, Q. Z., Multi-views on Nature Index of Chinese academic institutions. Scientometrics, 2018, 114(3), 823–837.
- Wang, X., Fang, Z., Li, Q. and Guo, X., The poor altmetric performance of publications authored by researchers in Mainland China. Front. Res. Metrics Anal., 2016, 1, 8.
- Teixeira da Silva, J. A., Does China need to rethink its metricsand citation-based research rewards policies? Scientometrics, 2017, 112(3), 1853–1857.
- Lepori, B., Thelwall, M. and Hafeez, B., Which US and European higher education institutions are visible in ResearchGate and what affects their RG score? J. Informetr., 2018, 12(3), 806–818.
- Banshal, S. K., Singh, V. K., Kaderye, G., Muhuri, P. K. and Sánchez, B. P., An altmetric analysis of scholarly articles from India. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., 2018, 34(5), 3111–3118.
- https://www.webofknowledge.com (accessed on 10 April 2019).
- https://www.altmetric.com/explorer (accessed on 10 April 2019).
- Rupika, U. A. and Singh, V. K., Measuring the university– industry–government collaboration in Indian research output. Curr. Sci,, 2016, 110(10), 1904.
- https://www.altmetric.com/about-our-data/the-donut-and-score/
- Comparing Research Performance of Private Universities in India with IITs, Central Universities and NITs
Abstract Views :233 |
PDF Views:72
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Computer Science, South Asian University, New Delhi 110 021, IN
2 Department of Computer Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221 005, IN
3 GESIS Leibniz Institute of Social Sciences, Cologne, DE
1 Department of Computer Science, South Asian University, New Delhi 110 021, IN
2 Department of Computer Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221 005, IN
3 GESIS Leibniz Institute of Social Sciences, Cologne, DE
Source
Current Science, Vol 116, No 8 (2019), Pagination: 1304-1313Abstract
During the last two decades the number of private universities in India has increased significantly. According to AISHE report of 2016, out of 799 universities in India, 277 are private universities, i.e. one out of every three universities in India is a private university. A significant proportion of colleges (about 78%) are also privately managed, as they do not contribute much to research activities and hence are not included in this analysis. Private universities are now becoming a major component of the Indian higher education system. Some of the private universities are exclusively positioning and projecting themselves as universities for high quality research and innovation. A few of them are now well placed in the national-level NIRF ranking framework. It is in this context that this paper presents a comparative account of research performance of the 25 most productive private universities with the set of Indian Institutes of Technology (IITs), Central Universities (CUs) and National Institutes of Technology (NITs), all of which have a well-established environment and culture of research. A set-based comparison methodology is followed. The results show good performance of private universities in research, especially in terms of output and rate of growth of output. However, on quality and productivity per capita and per rupee spent, they have a long way to go to match the performance levels of well-established centrally funded higher education institutions of India. This study presents detailed scientometric assessment of some most productive private universities in India.Keywords
Private Universities, Research Performance, Research in India, Research Policy.References
- All India Survey on Higher Education (2015–16), Department of Higher Education, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Govt of India; http://mhrd.gov.in/sites/upload_files/mhrd/files/statistics-new/AISHE2015-16.pdf
- Banshal, S. K., Singh, V. K., Basu, A. and Muhuri, P. K., Research performance of Indian Institutes of Technology. Curr. Sci., 2017, 112(5), 923–932.
- Solanki, T., Uddin, A. and Singh, V. K., Research competitiveness of Indian institutes of science education and research. Curr. Sci., 2016, 110(3), 307.
- Marisha, Banshal, S. K. and Singh, V. K., Research performance of central universities in India. Curr. Sci., 2017, 112(11), 2198– 2208.
- Basu, A., Banshal, S. K., Singhal, K. and Singh, V. K., Designing a composite index for research performance evaluation at the national or regional level: ranking Central Universities in India. Scientometrics, 2016, 107(3), 1171–1193.
- Bala, A. and Kumari, S., Research performance of National Institutes of Technology (NITs) of India during 2001–2010: a bibliometric analysis. SRELS J. Inf. Manage., 2013, 50(5), 555–572.
- Banshal, S. K., Solanki, T. and Singh, V. K., Research performance of National Institutes of Technology. Curr. Sci., 2018, 115(11), 2025–2036.
- Prathap, G. and Gupta, B. M., Ranking of Indian engineering and technological institutes for their research performance during 1999–2008. Curr. Sci., 2009, 97(3), 304–306.
- Prathap, G., Benchmarking research performance of the IITs using ‘Web of Science’ and ‘Scopus’ bibliometric databases. Curr. Sci., 2013, 105(8), 1134–1138.
- Prathap, G., The performance of research-intensive higher educational institutions in India. Curr. Sci., 2014, 107(3), 389–396.
- Nishy, P., Panwar, Y., Prasad, S., Mandal, G. K. and Prathap, G., An impact-Citations Exergy (iCX) trajectory analysis of leading research institutions in India. Scientometrics, 2012, 91(1), 245– 251.
- Prathap, G. and Sriram, P., Mega private universities in India: prospects and promise for world-class performance. Curr. Sci., 2017, 113(11), 2165–2167.
- www.nirfindia.org
- Rupika, Uddin, A. and Singh, V. K., Measuring the university– industry–government collaboration in Indian research output. Curr. Sci., 2016, 110(10), 1904–1909.
- Prathap, G., Making scientometric and economic sense out of NIRF 2017 data. Curr. Sci., 2017, 113(7), 1420–1423.